Disclaimer: The
"interim ICTSB response" is a collection of opinions
which does not necessarily represent a consensus view of
the ICTSB
| Generic
Consumer Requirements in ICT standardization extracted from the ANEC report |
Interim ICTSB response |
|---|---|
| 1. Open standards for wide range interoperability between IT-, | This is
dealt with under converging technologies. The typical example
is the multimedia
home platform |
| 2. Common technical requirements for quality, performance and technical safety of ICT-, telecommunications and entertainment electronic equipment; | QoS standards are available or on its way including Internet or IP Services;Safety is commonly covered by CENELEC EN 60950; |
| 3. Common standard solutions for free access of both service providers and clients (users) to new networks or services such as on-line services or digital broadcasting. This means standardized interfaces and encryption systems; | Standardization
does not decide on what consumers can get for free.Standards
are available, e.g. for DVB. Encryption is part of DVB and therefore
standardized.Some interfaces for external devices are requested
by regulation |
| 4. Compatible standard formats for new data storage media and equipment (e.g. DVD) irrespective of their purpose or area of operation; | They are compatible but not necessarily interoperable. Data format are different as they are used for different purposes or applications. |
| 5. Standardized interfaces and buses for easy linking ICT equipment, entertainment electronic components and household appliances to telecommunications- or power supply networks for data exchange, telephony or remote control of technical processes at home; | A number
of interfaces and buses exist as standardized or non-standardized
solutions using cabled or wireless/cordless connections. ETSI
TS 102 813 |
| 6. Standardized cables and connectors marked with common and easily understandable symbols. Symbols must have been tested out with end users (consumers). Symbol names should be explained in the user manual or similar non-technical documentation; | Cables
and connectors are standardized. Some may think that there are
too many.Differences are caused by history but also necessary
to cover the different characteristics which are required.It
is also a permanent conflict in standardization with a limited
number of technical solutions and the creation to cause technical
barriers to trade. Symbols |
| 7. Clear definitions of man-machine interfaces for the use of public and private services via ticketing and vending machines and public information terminals; including aspects such as accessibility, performance, and user information in respect of use by disabled persons; | This is dealt with by the ICTSB/DATSCG and individual ICTSB members but may not result in definite standards; guidance or code of practice should be sufficient. |
| 8. User-friendly hardware and software: Components, systems and devices (including software), which allow or facilitate inter-linking, must be user-friendly without requiring technical knowledge. User-friendliness includes any user instructions or manuals or online help; | Guidance has been given by standardization.Doubt could be expressed whether modern ICT equipment and services could be used without any technical knowledge. Training is needed to make more consumers fit for the Information Society; but this is not standardization's core business. |
| 9. New and revolutionary products, systems and services in the field of Information and Communication Technologies (e.g. Internet Telephony) shall be interoperable with existing solutions; | This is covered by ETSI's and their partners' work on IP-telephony. Note, IP-telephony is not necessarily the same as Internet telephony. |
| 10. Access to illegal and indecent content: Standardized hardware
and software 'features' have to be developed to prevent children
and younger people gaining access to pornographic, violent or
racist materials transmitted in any way; |
This is mainly a legal problem. Technical features can help to filter-out. To characterize specific content is outside the scope of standardization.Parent control of TV sets is a common feature which has been introduced without specific standards. |
| 11. Privacy and security: Common design and administration of technical components and services especially as part of open networks. Components and services must work together in such a way that a minimum of personal data, if any, is registered, processed and used by the specific service (the principle of 'data avoidance'); | Privacy
is regulated.CEN has an activity to help to apply legislation
in the field of data
protection |
| 12. Security infrastructure: Harmonized technical and organizational requirements for all elements of the security infrastructure (Trust Centres and approved bodies) for digital signatures to guarantee a high level of security, compatibility and interoperability within the system; | ICTSB/EESSI covers the eSignature. The services will come and may need additional standards. |
| 13. Digital signatures: Strong requirements for the security and privacy of hard- and software components used for the purpose of digital signatures within Trust Centres and on the user's/consumer's side; | See #12 |
| 14. Encryption standards: Strong encryption standard codes for secure use of electronic commerce and other uses (e.g. medical prescriptions); | Encryption is an integral part of eBusiness standardization. |
| 15. Standards should not force consumers to buy the same product for different purposes/systems; | Not well
understood. Is there an example? |
| 16. Where different system standards and non-compatible functionality exists for TV reception and video processing, multi-standard or multi-functionality TV sets and VCRs should be available on the market. | This is not a standardization issue.Anyway, these types of equipment are on the market. Multi-mode equipment in general is often required to deal with backward compatibility and regional peculiarities. These solutions have its price. |